In Part 1 on this topic, we examined typical reasons why investors might or might not want bonds as part of their retirement portfolio. Common investing advice suggests that investors should increase their percentage of bonds, relative to stocks, as they age.
Bond Planning Basics
You may have heard the rule of thumb: Your Age = Percentage of Bonds for your portfolio
E.g., Age 30 = 30% in Bonds, Age 60 = 60% in Bonds
As we discussed in Part 1, the choice of a bond percentage is dependent on personal factors such as risk tolerance, risk capacity, return goals, and investment behavior. But fighter pilots often end up with a military retirement pension (and potentially VA disability compensation) starting as early as their forties… should this factor in bond selection?
In planning for retirement income, a common method is to evaluate what returns the nest egg will throw off to understand what income you’ll be living on. For example, a $1,000,000 nest egg invested 100% in a bond (or bond fund) returning 5% should reliably throw off $50,000 per year. While that 5% isn’t guaranteed, retirees are usually going to assume some stability from bond returns.
If $50,000 is enough retirement income, then such a portfolio could be appropriate. But what if the income need is $80,000? It might be impossible to find a fixed income investment returning 8%. Most investors would look to stocks for the additional return, and just accept the risk that comes from stock volatility.
To get to $80K of income, a retiree might have to take more risk in the same $1M portfolio by having high percentage of stocks, e.g., 70% Stock / 30% Bond. If the portfolio returns 8%– winner2 chicken dinner. If it returns -3%, well… then hygienically unsound college habits like reversing underwear might creep back into your penny-pinching repertoire in retirement.
However, if the investor is a fighter pilot with an inflation-pacing $50K annual pension, then the retirement pension has just become the equivalent of a perpetual $1M bond portfolio with a 5% yield. In order to get to $80K of income need, the investor would only need to seek a 3% return on the original $1M s/he had invested. Depending on age and life expectancy, an all-cash portfolio might still provide enough income without any investment risk (but with serious inflation risk).
Let’s look at a more realistic scenario. Assume that you believe you can comfortably retire on the equivalent of $125,000 per year in today’s dollars. You won’t be funding college, paying for vulture-teenagers in your house, or writing mortgage checks anymore, right?
From Table 1, we can see that with a total of $40K from social security (which gets a COLA), and $50K from a military pension (also on COLA), then there’s only a gap of $35K. If you’re retiring today and assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, then the nest egg only needs $875K in it.
I’ll note that 4% is not a magic number. It is a common starting argument for what a portfolio might sustain based on the work of William Bengen. Often referred to as a “safe withdrawal rate” (SWR), the SWR assumptions usually include a conservative 50/50 stock/bond mix earning about 5-6% which is ample to provide an initial $35K in returns.
Relitigating the Case For and Against Bonds
In Part 1, we suggested that bonds might be appropriate for you in certain cases. Table 2 looks at those reasons and how you might think about the effect of your military pension.
Likewise, we looked at reasons you might not invest in bonds. Table 3 examines the effect of your military pension on those considerations.
The sweet spot for many fighter pilot investors might look like:
Use minimal bonds during accumulation years to maximize the potential for higher stock returns.
Approaching the hold short line for (actual) retirement, increase bond ratios to try to protect the nest egg for the first few years of retirement. This can help calibrate your expectations of retirement income when it’s not just some ethereal concept that’s 20+ years away.
Once safely at cruise altitude a few years into retirement, start to dial back the bond percentage to run up the score board on your available spending and legacy. Many retirees reduce spending as their activity level decreases in later retirement years unless large health care costs like nursing home or memory care come into play. After you’re a few years into retirement, you’ll also know what your real consumption habits are.
Factoring a military pension into portfolio construction and stock/bond ratios requires clear-eyed assumptions before you pull the trigger.
Will future pension COLAs shrink? Could you separate early? Could you be forced out / RIF’d?
If any of these happen, hopefully it’s early enough in your investing career to allow you to recalibrate your investment strategy if needed. Other considerations you need to factor in could be:
Survivor Benefit Plan. If your retirement assumptions include a full 50% of a 20-year base salary, but you pass early, will 55% of 50% be enough for your spouse? It’s a huge swing in the numbers and may not be enough guaranteed income for a surviving spouse. VA Disability Compensation also disappears when you die.
Consumption. Not the 19th century name for tuberculosis… What will your spending be like? Are you susceptible to the occasional bout of budget-mauling YOLO? You’ll need to really know what your family’s spending is like pre-retirement to account for it properly in retirement.
Health. If you or your spouse won’t have a lot of “go-go” years in retirement where you’re healthy enough to enjoy your money, you might need to conduct your planning as though spending will occur later in retirement and for less entertaining healthcare costs.
Legacy Goals. If you plan to leave a legacy, you might keep an “accumulation mindset” in your retirement years. This certainly would bear on your stock/bond allocation. If you want the check to the undertaker to bounce and have your kids make their own way, you can plan to spend more regardless of your stock/bond ratio.
Cleared to Rejoin
Bonds are generally not the sleek and sexy part of an investment portfolio, but ignore their effect on your investments at your peril. A military pension creates a great opportunity to rethink bonds, but like all financial planning topics, there’s a lot of dimensions to consider. If you haven’t done the math to determine how your pension will act like a bond portfolio, it’s time to get out the abacus or call your financial planner today.
Winged Wealth Management and Financial Planning LLC (WWMFP) is a registered investment advisor offering advisory services in the State of Florida and in other jurisdictions where exempted. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training.
This communication is for informational purposes only and is not intended as tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or as an endorsement of any company, security, fund, or other securities or non-securities offering. This communication should not be relied upon as the sole factor in an investment making decision.
Past performance is no indication of future results. Investment in securities involves significant risk and has the potential for partial or complete loss of funds invested. It should not be assumed that any recommendations made will be profitable or equal the performance noted in this publication.
The information herein is provided “AS IS” and without warranties of any kind either express or implied. To the fullest extent permissible pursuant to applicable laws, Winged Wealth Management and Financial Planning (referred to as “WWMFP”) disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, implied warranties of merchantability, non-infringement, and suitability for a particular purpose.
All opinions and estimates constitute WWMFP’s judgement as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. WWMFP does not warrant that the information will be free from error. The information should not be relied upon for purposes of transacting securities or other investments. Your use of the information is at your sole risk. Under no circumstances shall WWMFP be liable for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the information provided herein, even if WWMFP or a WWMFP authorized representative has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Information contained herein should not be considered a solicitation to buy, an offer to sell, or a recommendation of any security in any jurisdiction where such offer, solicitation, or recommendation would be unlawful or unauthorized.
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
Want to know more? Contact us or schedule a complimentary introductory call.
“Winged Wealth Management and Financial Planning LLC (“WWMFP”) is a registered investment advisor offering advisory services in the States of Florida and Texas and in other jurisdictions where exempted. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The presence of this website on the Internet shall not be directly or indirectly interpreted as a solicitation of investment advisory services to persons of another jurisdiction unless otherwise permitted by statute. Follow-up or individualized responses to consumers in a particular state by WWMFP in the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation shall not be made without our first complying with jurisdiction requirements or pursuant an applicable state exemption. All written content on this site is for information purposes only. Opinions expressed herein are solely those of WWMFP, unless otherwise specifically cited. Material presented is believed to be from reliable sources and no representations are made by our firm as to other parties’ informational accuracy or completeness. All information or ideas provided should be discussed in detail with an advisor, accountant or legal counsel prior to implementation.